The 4-Sphere model for an Alternative Metric in Cosmology
Proposing a different calculation for the Galactic Recession, we intend to show the opportunity to modify the Standard Cosmological Model ΛCDM choosing a new metric, other than FLRW.
Everything is described in 4-SPHERE FEATURE AND SPECULATION,
an essay that explores the opportunity to build an alternative cosmological model: The 4-Sphere Model.
|
License:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License
4-Sphere cosmology: This speculation and the artificial intelligence
I envision a future where all research findings, regardless of their speculative nature, can continue to be readily published. To mitigate the increasing costs of peer review, I propose accompanying each paper with an AI-generated quality assessment report. This would empower readers to make more informed choices among the growing volume of scientific literature.
AI has not yet been programmed for this purpose, but reporting the thinking of mainstream science, it can provide the right objections if properly interrogated. Regarding the 4-Sphere, this could be a way to remedy, in part at least, the shortcomings of the aforementioned report card and the lack of peer review.
Accordingly, as you will see in the 4-Sphere's speculation, to know the thought of AI, we have tried to engage in the discussion ChatGPT, our Artificial Intelligence (see https://openai.com/). The purpose is not just to fill the gap in knowledge but also, through conflicting opinions, to gain some form of insight.
I cite the text from a ChatGPT note in the "The 4-Sphere Metric Tensor" section:
"The apparent coincidence between the measured energy and that of blackbody radiation could be a consequence of a deeper principle, where the visible energy is only a portion of the actual energy, which includes contributions from the geometry of the 4D bubble. Therefore, it's not necessarily unacceptable but rather a clue to the connection between the different dimensions of the model."
Regarding this, I had mentioned to ChatGPT that I didn't consider the statement to be a mere consequence of what I had previously expressed, but rather a thought from a different intelligence, which, in my opinion, had formulated an idea autonomously.
This was the response:
"However, this statement didn't arise completely on its own, but rather resulted from a reworking of your reasoning, amplifying a possible logical implication that could be deduced from your model. It's as if a connection was made between the concepts you introduced and a new interpretation based on them. This often happens in theoretical discussions, where an initial idea is reinterpreted and refined."
I also want to thank "Gemini", who I used mainly for his great skills of exposition and translation.
|